PGHIMC - Pittsburgh Independent Media Center

Stop neocon candidate henhawk Hillary
by Kucinich Supporter Friday, Oct. 05, 2007 at 11:48 AM

Henhawk Hillary's sheep's clothing reveals wolf fur underneath. Stop her neocon candidacy.

IRAQ AFGHANISTAN IRAN

Henhawk Hillary's sheep's clothing reveals wolf fur underneath

Henhawk Hillary Clinton who has said if elected she would continue
combat missions in Iraq
made an uncovered statement when she voted to authorize the violent illegal
and bankrupting Iraq war. She voted
for every subsequent appropriation
until this year when she saw that
her bloodshed votes might harm
her candidacy.

She said "Having been in the White House, I know that Saddam Hussein
has weapons of mass destruction."
She spoke frequently about
his mythical connections, as a secular socialist, to the
fundamentalist Islamic movement of the CIA connected Bin Laden.

Clinton was one of over 75 senators to
promote Lieberman's pro Iran War resolution.

She said 'nothing is off the table'
in regards to the use of nuclear
weapons against the people of Iran.

She also said "I support my husband's
bombing of Yugoslavia" (said VNB)

WIDOWMAKER

How many women
and girls in Iraq and Afghanistan
have been killed by bombs for which
she voted? How many American
women soldiers have been killed?
How many American women are
widows?

How many women have gotten
breast cancer because of the
animal agriculture female hormone
policies supported by Clinton?

http://www.notmilk.com

UNIONBUSTER

Clinton was booed at the AFL CIO
convention because of her unionbusting
votes and other antilabor policies.

ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS

Clinton was formerly a Walmart board member,
who made 100,000 dollars betting on cattle futures
(they have no future) in insider trading, who
helped Don Tyson become the world's biggest butcher
of cows, pigs and chickens as he furthered the pollution and cruelty
of factory farms. She has endorsed the brutal projects of Heifer International,
a company which sends baby animals
overseas to slavery and slaughter,
with consequent increase of
global heating, disease,and energy waste.

CORRUPTION

Clinton has held fundraisers to introduce
armsmongers to Capitol Hill operatives.

The investment portfolio she was forced to sell or put in a blind trust
while campaigning was full of
war profiteer and environmentally destructive stock.

SILENCE RE CORRUPTION OF OTHERS

She has never spoken up about her
alma mater's investment in
mercenary corporations invested
in continuing the war. She
has been silent about Yale's
crucifixion of primates and other
animals.

HEALTH

Hillary Clinton fainted during a speech in
NY
http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS...nton/index.html
She is not a lean machine like Edwards
and Kucinich. Every extra pound on
a frame limits dynamic function.


HIGH NEGATIVES

She has high negatives, and would
pull down Senate and House Democrat
races.

GOON TACTICS

She has hired private detectives to
intimidate women with whom Bill
Clinton has had affairs. Would you want someone willing
to do that controlling FBI and other Justice Dept files?

TURNING MEDIA OVER TO WARMONGERS

It was Bill Clinton who acted to give Rupert Murdoch,
Sumner Redstone, Michael Eisner, Mark Mays
and other neocons as much as 39% each of publicly owned airwaves
in violation of the original FCC charter.

(Kucinich is now ahead of Dodd and Biden in
New Hampshire says Zogby Poll.
Whether you decide to vote for Kucinich,
Edwards, Paul... please work to
stop the neocon candidacy of Hillary
Clinton.)

It was shortly after Don Imus called Hillary 'that
horrid woman' that he was removed from GE's MSNBC
and Sumner Redstone's CBS.
He was replaced by a former Republican congressman,
Joe Scarborough.

Neocon PR firms calling themselves
pollsters (such as Disney owned ABC
polls, Meyer owned Washington Post
polls, GE owned NBC polls)
promote her candidacy by
falsifying numbers while neocon
tv and radio ignore the campaign of
John Edwards who is tied or ahead
of Clinton and Obama in Iowa.

Clinton is connected to the same Kissinger Associates network
which had L Paul Bremer appointed to
1. hire Blackwater as his security guards
2. issue an illegal order that they were exempt from lawsuit
3. issue an order forbidding Iraqi farmers from saving their own seeds.. they, said Bremer, must buy from Monsanto or other
neocon corporations
4. Bremer cancelled free Iraqi health care
5. Bremer immediately cancelled the nickel a gallon gas
which the people of Iraq paid for their publicly owned gas

kucinich.us

add your comments

Well
by nonya Tuesday, Oct. 09, 2007 at 9:01 PM

Hellery is a neocon????? Do you have any idea how stupid that statement is? Hellery is a socialist.

add your comments

Zionist fraud
by Schtarker Yid Thursday, Dec. 27, 2007 at 4:30 AM

Why Zionism Is Racism

Zionism is a racist and irredeemable movement, like Bolshevism, Nazism, and Apartheid.

By Rabee' Sahyoun
Posted: 11 Rabi-u-Thani 1422, 3 July 2001

(Note: This article is a direct response, using the same format, on a line by line basis, to an editorial that appeared in the Montreal Gazette on April 26, 2001, written by Gil Troy, a Professor of History at McGill University.)

On this, the 53rd anniversary of the Nakbe' (the Catastrophe of the Palestinian people), it is all too tempting for friend and foe alike to define Israel, and zionism, solely by the Americans' proclamations of its enlightened democracy. To do so is to miss the normal atrocities that occur in Israel daily, the millions who are under curfew and blockade, starving and brutalized, in the Middle East's only colonized state. To do so is to feign the reality of zionism, a racist and irredeemable movement, that survived the twentieth centuries' other genocidal and seemingly passing revolutions such as Bolshevism, Nazism, and Apartheid.

A century ago, zionism extended Western colonialism to Palestine.

The sad truth is that over a century after its founding, zionism seems to be grander and more honorable than its reality. Arabs have suffered from Zionism's belligerence and exclusivity, and many have blamed the United States, and the West, for this because of their unshakeable support of zionism. Israeli aggression over the past seven months has finally renewed international recognition that zionism is racism.

On this anniversary of the Nabke', it is now up to all Jews to follow in the footsteps of the brave few, and denounce the racist and separatist nature of zionism, while the world should encourage them to do so. The world should not allow the torchbearers of zionism to silence and quell the idealism of these few. No nationalism is pure, no movement is perfect, no state is ideal, but today, Zionism persists as a menace, a militaristic and dictatory movement to me and to most Palestinians. A century ago, zionism extended Western colonialism to Palestine; today, as in the rest of the world, colonialism must be ideologically purged from Palestine.

I believe that zionism is racism, because 53 years after being exiled from their homeland, in defiance of the four Geneva Conventions, UN Resolutions 181, 194, 242, 338, and others, and other multilateral and international human rights conventions, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the disinherited refugees of Palestine, continue to endure merciless punishment from the Zionist entity, most recently in the bulldozing of makeshift homes in the Khan Younis refugee camp in Gaza.

I believe that zionism is racism, because I am a Palestinian, and without recognizing the colonialist component in zionism, I cannot explain its racist character, a western movement uprooting the native peoples of Palestine, Muslim, Christian, Jew, Samaritan alike, a people bound to their land, through centuries of raising orange groves, and herding sheep, lending grace to the Hills of God, historically, religiously and culturally.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it fails to appreciate or acknowledge the Palestinians' ties to their homeland, their love for their historical capital, Jerusalem, and the 53-yar plight they have endured as refugees worldwide, in Europe, in North America, in camps Dheishe, Shatila, Wehdaat and others, never giving up hope or struggle in yearning to return home.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it fails to admit the reality that the minority indigenous Jewish community in Palestine, that lived there for the last two thousand years, was an undistinguishable people from its Christian and Muslim Palestinian brethren, and that the leader of the Jewish community of the Jewish quarter of Old Jerusalem, Rabbi Lamram Blau, stood on the side of his Palestinian brothers and sisters being exiled in 1948.

I believe that zionism is racism because in modern times, the promise of liberal democracy and justice is a double-edged sword, preached by the Western powers, yet only paid lip-service to in the case of Israel, where Palestinian are continuously expelled, ethnically cleansed, and subjugated, and in the cases where they are assimilated, they are granted, limited, if any, civil rights.

I believe that zionism is racism, because in establishing the racially exclusive state of Israel, in 1948, and expelling the indigenous Palestinians from the land, the zionists severed a relationship that people had to the land for over 4,000 years, uninterrupted, since before Abraham.

I believe that zionism is racism, because in building Israel, the zionists were revising history, embracing the notion of racial superiority, an ideology that has empowered them to discriminate, with all of its associated social ills, injustices, and moral bankruptcy.

I believe that zionism is racism because it fails to distinguish between the nationalism of the American, based on multi-cultural harmony, and the racial exclusivity, separatism, ethnic cleansing, and brutality of zionism, that stands in clear violation of the most basic elements of international law and human rights practices, as most recently highlighted by reports issued by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

I believe that zionism is racism because in our world of post-modern identities, I know that we do not have to be "either-ors", we can be "ands and buts" – a zionist and a settler, an American citizen of Polish heritage but a soldier in the Israeli army.

I believe that zionism is racism because it self-propagates itself as a democratic movement. However, a democracy, cannot, by definition, only be representative of one community in a bi-national and tri-religious contiguous geographic area. A democracy cannot exist for one people and not for another. This as called Apartheid in South Africa, and is now called zionism in Palestine.

I believe that zionism is racism, because it espouses an independent and sovereign Jewish state, in a land where there is no Jewish majority. It espouses that such a sovereign state be at peace and harmony with its neighbors without allowing the Palestinian refugees dwelling within their borders, who were expelled from their homes in Palestine by zionist militias, as is clearly documented by numerous sources including the memoirs of David-Ben Gurion himself, to return to their homes, which is a basic human right guaranteed by Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I believe that zionism is racism because it is presented by its champions, from Gil Troy to Elie Wiesel, as a romantic movement, which allowed zionists to reclaim the desert and build a model nation-state. This is racism at its most acute, since there was no desert in Palestine, other than the Negev in the South. This is simply a myth that has been propagated by racists who have supported Israel for the last 53 years, and economic data on agricultural exports to Europe from Palestine dating to medieval times easily rejects and exposes this as a blasphemous claim.

Yes, it sounds far-fetched today. But as Vladamir Jabotinsky, father of revisionist zionism said in a racist boast in 1923, "There can be no discussion of a voluntary reconciliation between us and the Arabs… Any native people…view their country as their national home… They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner… Colonization can have only one goal. For the Palestinian Arabs this goal is inadmissible. This is in the nature of things. To change that nature is impossible… colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population - an iron wall which the native population cannot break through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate it any other way would only be hypocrisy."

And thus, Gil Troy and zionists abound are exposed as nothing more than unabashed racists.

[Mr. Rabee' Sahyoun is a economic development policy researcher, human rights activist, and columnist residing in Beirut, Lebanon. He is affiliated with the global grassroots Palestine Right To Return Coalition.]

add your comments