community-based, non-corporate, participatory media
The following post has status hidden:
SFIMC Officially defrocked from the Collective
by Rick ;acting editor for now •
Monday, Jan. 29, 2007 at 11:37 PM
SFIMC Officially defrocked from the Collective
SFIMC Officially defrocked from the Collective
It all comes out in the end
the ongoing controversy surrounding the articles from SFIMC
and the continuous spam like posting of one of the editors has finally been brought to a Halt!
the IMC collective has taken action on the issue of inappropriate behavior of editors and staff from the renegade
news group in the west.
SF has been suspended from operation in the IMC collective. their equipment is the property of the collective and in the coming weeks will be redistributed to other Imc's with more worthy goals for social change.
the Leadership of the IMC collective wishes to apologize for the prolonged episodes of childish behavior that was allowed to come out of SF. this type of harassment of other IMC's is inexcusable we sight the poor management of this group for the final decision to close and dismantle the site
it's temporary
by it's temporary
Friday, Feb. 02, 2007 at 8:57 AM
He only has to scrounge the dumpsters for more AOL surplus.
yawn
by spelling coach
Friday, Feb. 02, 2007 at 5:09 PM
This effects a number of sites.
The correct word is affects, Mr. "Journalist".
disinformation
by don't believe it
Saturday, Feb. 24, 2007 at 1:36 PM
See also:
http://la.indymedia.org/news/hidden.php?id=191110#192557
"by nessie Tuesday July 20, 2004 at 05:38 AM"
by another forgery
Saturday, Feb. 24, 2007 at 1:39 PM
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/1555696_comment.php#1692248
(snip)
Sometimes they take something that an anti-Zionist has written, subtly alter its meaning by changing a few words, and post it under the name of the original author.
(snip)
The only possible reason
by appalled
Saturday, Feb. 24, 2007 at 1:46 PM
that this:
http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/hidden.php?id=26558#26682
was hidden is that the one of the editors here is a fundamentally dishonest person who is trying to discredit Indymedia from the inside by publishing lies and hiding the disclaimers. This is not the first time it has happened. What is this guy's agenda, anyway? Why does the rest of the Pgh. IMC collective let him make Indymedia look like a purveyor of disinformation? Who benefits when Indymedia demonstrates that it can't be trusted to tell the truth? Hint: It's not the Global Justice Movement.