community-based, non-corporate, participatory media
The following post has status hidden:
"all editors are volunteers"
by unbelievable •
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 3:22 PM
This is not a plausible explanation for the the editors fostering all the nessie/smashy spam
They have enough time to hide this:
http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2006/06/23922_comment.php
but they don't have time to hide the actual spam that it talks about!?!
I don't believe it. I think they host this crap on purpose.
This is inexcusably bad politics
by for shame, Pgh IMC, for shame
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 3:24 PM
It's even worse journalism.
wrong
by editor
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 4:09 PM
the above story was hidden, which is clearly displayed at the top of that page.
if you were serious about lodging a complaint about editorial policy, you would email the address and reach the right people. continuing to post disruptive inappropriate content just shows how disingenuous these faux-shocked requests for "moderation" are.
your attempts at disruption are not working. *yawn*
we aren't paying much attention to trolls while advancing our mission of "community based, non-corporate participatory media"
also hidden
by editor
Tuesday, Jun. 06, 2006 at 4:11 PM
imc-pgh-editorial@lists.indypgh.org
and in case it wasn't clear, this post to the newswire will also be hidden.
"thanks to the editors here"
by Matt
Thursday, Aug. 31, 2006 at 12:40 AM
"thanks to the editors here"
for allowing the freedom that few IMC's allow
we like your idea of freedom and understand that
one person (the subject of this thread) would rather
play dictator. and we will continue to tolerate the rantings for freedom's sake. anything less would be inexcusably bad politics
"thanks to the editors here"
by Matt
Thursday, Aug. 31, 2006 at 12:46 AM
"thanks to the editors here"
for allowing the freedom that few IMC's allow
we like your idea of freedom and understand that
one person (the subject of this thread) would rather
play dictator. and we will continue to tolerate the rantings for freedom's sake. anything less would be inexcusably bad politics