community-based, non-corporate, participatory media

About Contact Us Policies Mailing Lists Radio Video Publish! Calendar Search

View article without comments

FOX Whistleblower: Miles from 'fair and balanced'
by Tim Rutten Friday, Oct. 31, 2003 at 5:01 PM
letters@latimes.com

"Daily life at [Fox] is all about management politics....Editorially, the FNC newsroom is under the constant control and vigilance of management....[Fox] is, to a large extent, 'Roger's [Murdoch] Revenge' against what he considers a liberal, pro-Democrat media establishment...."

Miles from 'fair and balanced'
Tim Rutten, Los Angeles Times, November 1, 2003

A veteran producer this week alleged that Fox News executives issue a daily memorandum to staff on news coverage to bend the network's reporting into conformity with management's political views, refocusing attention on the partisan bias of America's most watched cable news operation.

The charges by Charlie Reina, 55, whose six-year tenure at Fox ended April 9, first surfaced Wednesday in a letter he posted on an influential Web site (http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45) maintained by Jim Romenesko for the Poynter Institute, an organization that promotes journalistic education and ethics.

Concerns about Fox, which styles its news coverage as "fair and balanced," begin with its owner, Australian-born Rupert Murdoch. The corporate boards and family investors who control most of the American news media generally feel obliged to maintain a wall of separation between news and editorial opinion. Murdoch, by contrast, operates in the style of the traditional Fleet Street proprietors, who dismiss such distinctions as inconvenient fictions.

And as a deeply conservative man, he is willing to put his money where his politics are: Murdoch, a naturalized U.S. citizen, subsidizes publication of the Weekly Standard, one of the country's most influential right-wing journals. According to a forthcoming book by the New Yorker's Ken Auletta, he loses as much as $40 million a year maintaining the New York Post as an outlet of conservatism in Manhattan.

As Fox's founding president, he hired Roger Ailes, a shrewd Republican political operative who earned a well-founded reputation for bare-knuckle campaigning while working for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. As one of the architects of the elder George Bush's media strategy in his campaign for president against Democratic rival Michael Dukakis, Ailes helped devise the notorious Willie Horton commercials. As he told Time magazine in August 1988, "The only question is whether we depict Willie Horton with a knife in his hand or without it."

The late Lee Atwater, another Bush aide, described Ailes as having "two speeds -- attack and destroy." Before joining Fox, where he serves now as chairman, Ailes produced Rush Limbaugh's short-lived television talk show.

According to Reina's letter, "Daily life at [Fox] is all about management politics....Editorially, the FNC newsroom is under the constant control and vigilance of management. The pressure ranges from subtle to direct. First, it's a news network run by one of the most high-profile political operatives of recent times. Everyone there understands that [Fox] is, to a large extent, 'Roger's Revenge' against what he considers a liberal, pro-Democrat media establishment that has shunned him for decades. For the staffers, many of whom are too young to have come up through the ranks of objective journalism, and all of whom are nonunion, with no protections regarding what they can be made to do, there is undue motivation to please the big boss."

Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told The Times that "these accusations are the rantings of a bitter, disgruntled former employee. It's unfortunate that Charlie's career ended the way it did, but we wish him well." Asked whether Reina's quotations from the memos were inaccurate or taken out of context, Zimmerman said, "All we are saying is that these are false accusations." The Times' request to speak with Ailes was denied: "Roger is not addressing this and is not available," Zimmerman said.

Reina, who told The Times he left Fox in a dispute over salary and workload -- not politics -- hardly comes across as a knee-jerk liberal. He is at pains, for example, to say that he believes his former employer's cable rivals -- CNN and MSNBC -- also air news reports riven with bias on both ends of the political spectrum. At Fox, he not only produced the network's weekly media criticism show, "News-Watch," but also a series of specials on Newt Gingrich and a talk show with conservative religious commentator Cal Thomas.

Still, Reina, whose 30-year career includes stints at the Associated Press, ABC News and CBS, said Fox's ideological problems begin with Ailes.

"Roger is such a high-profile and partisan political operative that everyone in the newsroom knows what his political feelings are and acts accordingly. I'd never worked in a newsroom like that," he said in an interview. "Never. At ABC, for example, I never knew what management or my bosses' political views were, much less felt pressure from them to make things come out a certain way. I'm talking about news bias, and I never experienced it there. At CBS or the AP, if a word got in that suggested bias -- liberal or conservative -- it was taken out.

"At Fox it was all about viewpoint. I'm not talking about the nighttime personalities. I'm talking about the news report. Fox executives will say their network only appears conservative because it is fair, when everyone else is liberal and biased. That's bull. Fox doesn't 'seem' conservative and Republican. It is conservative and Republican."

In his letter, Reina wrote that "the roots of [Fox's] day-to-day on-air bias are actual and direct. They come in the form of an executive memo" written by John Moody, the network's vice president for news, and "distributed electronically each morning, addressing what stories will be covered and, often, suggesting how they should be covered. To the newsroom personnel responsible for the channel's daytime programming, The Memo is the bible. If, on any given day, you notice that the Fox anchors seem to be trying to drive a particular point home, you can bet The Memo is behind it. The Memo was born with the Bush administration, early in 2001, and, intentionally or not, has ensured that the administration's point of view consistently comes across on [Fox]....

"For instance, from the March 20th memo: 'There is something utterly incomprehensible about [U.N. Secretary-General] Kofi Annan's remarks in which he allows that his thoughts are 'with the Iraqi people.' One could ask where those thoughts were during the 23 years Saddam Hussein was brutalizing those same Iraqis. Food for thought.' Can there be any doubt that the memo was offering not only 'food for thought,' but a direction for the FNC writers and anchors to go? Especially after describing the U.N. Secretary General's remarks as 'utterly incomprehensible'?....

"One day this past spring, just after the U.S. invaded Iraq, The Memo warned us that anti-war protesters would be 'whining' about U.S. bombs killing Iraqi civilians and suggested they could tell that to the families of American soldiers dying there. Editing copy that morning, I was not surprised when an eager young producer killed a correspondent's report on the day's fighting -- simply because it included a brief shot of children in an Iraqi hospital....

"These are not isolated incidents at Fox News Channel, where virtually no one of authority in the newsroom makes a move unmeasured against management's politics, actual or perceived. At the Fair and Balanced network, everyone knows management's point of view, and, in case they're not sure how to get it on air, The Memo is there to remind them."

Av Westin, a longtime ABC news executive who is now executive director of the National Television Academy, examined Reina's letter and said: "Nothing about this surprises me. The uniform smirks and body language that are apparent in Fox's reports throughout the day reflect an operation that is quite tightly controlled. The fact that young and inexperienced producers acquiesce to that control by pulling stories is further evidence that nonjournalistic forces are at work in that newsroom.

"Roger runs the place with an iron hand and he was put in place there by Murdoch, who selected him for his politics. In that sense, what's happened at Fox is a carry-over from all Murdoch's print publications, where the publisher's politics and editorial preference is reflected in the news hole to an extent that isn't true anywhere else in American journalism."

Reina is out of television news these days, supporting himself in New York with a small woodworking business.

Looking back on his time with Fox, his greatest concern is for its young staff. "Many of them wanted to be on television but not necessarily in news. They haven't had the benefit of traditional journalistic training, so they're easily molded.

"Time after time I watched what management's politics did to the young anchors. As they near the time to get their own show, the hair gets blonder and the bias gets clearer."

add your comments


1/2 Truth is a lie
by Tom Snell Saturday, Nov. 01, 2003 at 9:17 AM
dutch47@direcway.com

I personally have heard many 1/2 truths on CBS, ABC, and NBC. The only way I knew they were 1/2 truths was the fact that in 1988 there was a show called Rush Limbaugh and he would play the audio tape of the 1/2 truth and then let the whole tape play so we could hear for ourselves the whole truth. The other half of the truth that the rest of the media would leave out. We did not have to take Rush's word for it he had the actual people on tape saying it with their own voices. IF YOU WANT TO PROVE FOX NEWS IS A LIAR SHOW ME WHERE THEY HAVE LEFT OUT HALF THE STORY TO SLANT IT. I have not ever seen that yet.

add your comments


half-truths
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Saturday, Nov. 01, 2003 at 2:11 PM
BraveNewWorldOrderFighter@yahoo.com

half-truths...
e-pentagon_animation.giflqgvsr.gif, image/png, 322x218

One-half of the truth is that something crashed into the Pentagon and caused an explosion that left the steel-reinforced granite wall standing for about 25 minutes before it collapsed into a tidy, squared-off heap.

The other half of the truth is that there is no Boeing 757-200 commercial airliner to be seen in this strangely choppy little clip on MSNBC's website, or in any still news photographs taken on September 11.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/720851.asp?cp1=1

A sage has noted that when an honest man is confronted with the facts that show he is mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest. Now, that's a whole truth.

add your comments


Two Truths: A Haiku by 2Beers
by 2Beers Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 2:57 AM

True I know for sure
BraveNewWorldOrderFighter
The plane is missing

Oh where did it go
with all those people on board
Please answer me that

Now riddle me this
what if the plane hit the roof
first and fell inside

True also I know
at ninety-nine decibels
it still makes no sense

A haiku for you
from 2Beers to your left ear
right and sensible

add your comments


an honest man
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Sunday, Nov. 02, 2003 at 5:36 AM
BraveNewWorldOrderFighter@yahoo.com

Perhaps someone at a mainstream news organization--say, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette--would address your questions. Perhaps not.

There is lots of junk to sift through on the Internet, but The New York Times presents itself as The Truth.

I'll take my chances on the Internet.

add your comments


this one's for you
by BraveNewBrainTransplantGuineaPig Sunday, Nov. 09, 2003 at 6:53 PM

Here's to the incredibly obsessed hologram of the IndyMedia.

This post will self destruct in 5 seconds....

-------------


"What IS Mind Control?"

written by Eleanor White

The term "mind control" has many meanings, for example, advertising, sublminal advertising, hypnotic self help, or government propaganda. However, the type of mind control I'm going to describe here is currently and increasingly happening to at least thousands of innocent citizens world wide. It is sometimes referred to as 'psycho-electronic' mind control.

Apparently growing out of earlier government mind control research programs such as MKULTRA, and government suppression-of-dissent programs
such as COINTELPRO, today's "mind control" is covert, finely crafted, around the clock harassment perpetrated against citizens living in their homes and
communities.

This harassment is greatly enhanced by very advanced electronics which can produce a wide variety of painful and debilitating symptoms silently,
from a distance, leaving no trace evidence.

Along with electronically applied pain, sleep deprivation, dissolution of memory, and other mind/body effects, there is frequent entry into the
home, car, and workplace of the chosen victim.

Sabotage of property, thefts, and dirtying of premises are common. Electrical appliances can be made to malfunction, or fail FAR sooner than their normal life. Unusual noise from neighbours is common.

Destruction of family and other relationships by way of lies, bribes, and threats is a goal of the non-electronic phase of today's "mind control".

One mind control victim is also an adept remote viewer. She was able to view each of her local harassers, and describe to them in formal letters to the harassers what they were doing to disrupt her life. In these formal letters, she outlined the penalties for the crimes which were being committed by her local harassers. This actually stopped most
of the harassment. One insight she was able to give us was that there are church members who actually feel they are "angels left behind so we can
straighten people out so they can come to the Lord."

Of course, these zealously religious 'angels' are not only acting based on lies, they are themselves committing serious crimes. Other public service groups and agencies were part of the remotely viewed local harassment team.

When serious lies are used to cause carefully scripted harassment, and electronics are used to destroy the target's faculties, the target's life is virtually worthless.
In almost all cases, once the harassment starts, it continues for life.

Destruction of the chosen victim's ability to earn a living is a long term component of this type of mind control. Sabotage of work and any company property in the victim's custody are used.

As with friends and family, lies are used to secure the cooperation of the victim's co-workers. Memories necessary for the victim to carry out assigned work are electronically suppressed. Fatigue and symptoms of illness are use often to reduce the effectiveness of the victim as an employee.

I can tell you from the experiences of many victims, that 'mind control', as being covertly practiced today, is real. And, if a survey of 12,000 North Americans in April, 2002 is any indication, mind control operations
may be affecting as many as one percent, or three million, of those of us living in North America today.


http://www.mindcontrolminute.com/

add your comments


Irv, it'll lose value if you it of the box
by USS Liberty Sunday, Nov. 09, 2003 at 10:28 PM

Irv, it'll lose valu...
af-coulter-box.jpg, image/jpeg, 190x440

History's most successful transgendered novelist and author of short fiction in newspapers finally has "her" own doll, sorry, I mean "action figure".
RuPaul was a much better feamle impersonator

add your comments


Irv, it'll lose value if you it of the box
by USS Liberty Sunday, Nov. 09, 2003 at 10:28 PM

Irv, it'll lose valu...
af-coulter-box.jpg28k6cx.jpg, image/jpeg, 190x440

History's most successful transgendered novelist and author of short fiction in newspapers finally has "her" own doll, sorry, I mean "action figure".
RuPaul was a much better female impersonator

add your comments


Jealousy
by a real man Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 4:05 AM

You are all just jealous of the success of Fax News and of Ann Coulter. It is so clear that you are seething at the impending death of the Left that you can't even think straight. You probably fantasize that Ann Coulter is a crossdresser so you find her more attractive. But she is a babe.

add your comments


Crossdresser?
by USS Liberty Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 5:23 AM

Prominent Adam's apple? No pictures as a child or high school yearbook or no one from "her" hometown remembers "her"?
When asked about mariage or family or anything else pertaining to gender"she" answers "I'm a Republican".

Ann Coulter is man, baby. Post-op transexual

add your comments


and if she was???
by Irving Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 6:58 AM

You hypocrites are now turning your backs on all the poor little oppressed faddish "transgendered" ? Oh, I love that Orwellian invented word.

Are you a trans-a-phobe now?

But what's new? Leftists always claim the high road while turning their backs when the time to pay up comes due. Ask anyone who made it through a torture chamber.

add your comments


Ann, just admit it
by USS Liberty Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 8:12 AM

She'd be recieved with open arms if she'd quit hating herself and projecting it elsewhere.

add your comments


hate and projection
by Irving Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 8:40 AM

hate and projection...
brain_dead_leftist_opt2.gif, image/png, 335x300

Isn't that what you heterophobes are? Self loathing and collaborating with the Enemy doesn't become you.

Nothing like a Leftist to twist things around and blame others for what they are. But that's what society gets when allowing hippies to spawn unchecked. The children of '60's dopeheads had to grow up essentially alone, and their "parents", such as they were, undoubtedly projected their irrelevance onto their children, same as an alcoholic would do.

add your comments


open arms
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 9:20 AM

So why is it the homosexuals complain when they're not received with open arms?

Seems hypocritical to me.

add your comments


I thought you worshipped collaborators?
by USS Liberty Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 9:24 AM

From the drooling bedsore's support of Saddam, to his arming, training, and funding of what would become al Qaeda.
To the Israeli attacks on American ships and their sale of US technology to Red China.

Prescott's funding of your beloved Nazi party in the '30's
and Dumbya's partenership with Osama in Arbusto Energy, circa '77.

It's bootlicking wannabees like yourself who fellate and apologize for the ruling classes who are the true collaborators, and hopefully the same six man wet detail will take you out behind the chemical sheds with them.

add your comments


A piece of advice for all you leftists ..
by 2Beers Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 9:56 AM

A piece of advice fo...
mc_gthp.jpgkq1nms.jpg, image/jpeg, 174x240

add your comments


bedsores
by USS Lick Me Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 10:05 AM

I have AIDS. Fellate my running sores.

add your comments


Remember
by R. Reagan Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 10:12 AM

There is no such thing as AIDS, at least not in public.
The same way the Deserter in Chief hasn't said "Osama bin Laden" since July '02. Thta's no way to treat a family friend.

add your comments


pure as the driven snow
by USS Lick Me Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 10:19 AM

We always hear the never ending projectionist Borgies call Bush a Nazi. But those same disengenuous pieces of shit never acknowledge the Nazis and their sympathizers of their DemocRATic party. Ain't that right, Little Precious?



Joseph Kennedy and the Jews
By Edward Renehan, Jr.

Arriving at London in early 1938, newly-appointed U.S. Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy took up quickly with another transplanted American. Viscountess Nancy Witcher Langhorne Astor assured Kennedy early in their friendship that he should not be put off by her pronounced and proud anti-Catholicism.

"I'm glad you are smart enough not to take my [views] personally," she wrote. Astor pointed out that she had a number of Roman Catholic friends - G.K. Chesterton among them - with whom she shared, if nothing else, a profound hatred for the Jewish race. Joe Kennedy, in turn, had always detested Jews generally, although he claimed several as friends individually. Indeed, Kennedy seems to have tolerated the occasional Jew in the same way Astor tolerated the occasional Catholic.

As fiercely anti-Communist as they were anti-Semitic, Kennedy and Astor looked upon Adolf Hitler as a welcome solution to both of these "world problems" (Nancy's phrase). No member of the so-called "Cliveden Set" (the informal cabal of appeasers who met frequently at Nancy Astor's palatial home) seemed much concerned with the dilemma faced by Jews under the Reich. Astor wrote Kennedy that Hitler would have to do more than just "give a rough time" to "the killers of Christ" before she'd be in favor of launching "Armageddon to save them. The wheel of history swings round as the Lord would have it. Who are we to stand in the way of the future?" Kennedy replied that he expected the "Jew media" in the United States to become a problem, that "Jewish pundits in New York and Los Angeles" were already making noises contrived to "set a match to the fuse of the world."

During May of 1938, Kennedy engaged in extensive discussions with the new German Ambassador to the Court of St. James's, Herbert von Dirksen. In the midst of these conversations (held without approval from the U.S. State Department), Kennedy advised von Dirksen that President Roosevelt was the victim of "Jewish influence" and was poorly informed as to the philosophy, ambitions and ideals of Hitler's regime. (The Nazi ambassador subsequently told his bosses that Kennedy was "Germany's best friend" in London.)

Columnists back in the states condemned Kennedy's fraternizing. Kennedy later claimed that 75% of the attacks made on him during his Ambassadorship emanated from "a number of Jewish publishers and writers. ... Some of them in their zeal did not hesitate to resort to slander and falsehood to achieve their aims." He told his eldest son, Joe Jr., that he disliked having to put up with "Jewish columnists" who criticized him with no good reason.

Like his father, Joe Jr. admired Adolf Hitler. Young Joe had come away impressed by Nazi rhetoric after traveling in Germany as a student in 1934. Writing at the time, Joe applauded Hitler's insight in realizing the German people's "need of a common enemy, someone of whom to make the goat. Someone, by whose riddance the Germans would feel they had cast out the cause of their predicament. It was excellent psychology, and it was too bad that it had to be done to the Jews. The dislike of the Jews, however, was well-founded. They were at the heads of all big business, in law etc. It is all to their credit for them to get so far, but their methods had been quite unscrupulous ... the lawyers and prominent judges were Jews, and if you had a case against a Jew, you were nearly always sure to lose it. ... As far as the brutality is concerned, it must have been necessary to use some ... ."

Brutality was in the eye of the beholder. Writing to Charles Lindbergh shortly after Kristallnacht in November of 1938, Joe Kennedy Sr. seemed more concerned about the political ramifications stemming from high-profile, riotous anti-Semitism than he was about the actual violence done to the Jews. "... Isn't there some way," he asked, "to persuade [the Nazis] it is on a situation like this that the whole program of saving western civilization might hinge? It is more and more difficult for those seeking peaceful solutions to advocate any plan when the papers are filled with such horror." Clearly, Kennedy's chief concern about Kristallnacht was that it might serve to harden anti-fascist sentiment at home in the United States.

Like his friend Charles Coughlin (an anti-Semitic broadcaster and Roman Catholic priest), Kennedy always remained convinced of what he believed to be the Jews' corrupt, malignant, and profound influence in American culture and politics. "The Democratic [party] policy of the United States is a Jewish production," Kennedy told a British reporter near the end of 1939, adding confidently that Roosevelt would "fall" in 1940.

But it wasn't Roosevelt who fell. Kennedy resigned his ambassadorship just weeks after FDR's overwhelming triumph at the polls. He then retreated to his home in Florida: a bitter, resentful man nurturing religious and racial bigotries that put him out-of-step with his country, and out-of-touch with history.

add your comments


partners in crime
by zzzzzzzzzzzzz Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 10:35 AM

download PDF (53.4 kibibytes)

Hey Irving and 2beers - look up at the stop signs around town and you may see the truth...........

add your comments


truth
by my sores need licking Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 10:46 AM

"Truth" from a Leftist? From a dime-a-dozen Collaborator? Who crys "racism" and "human rights" and all that typical highbrow shit, until it's time to back their words up? Who marches in favor of tyrants? Who mewls for the United Nations, one of the darkest blots on human history?

aHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..........

add your comments


Back it up
by zzzzzzzzz Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 11:01 AM

Yo Irv - I always back it up. Just let me know...........

add your comments


backed up
by USS Plague Carrier Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 11:19 AM

Oh, I'm sure you can back it up....

add your comments


FAUX viewer fantasy
by matchmaker Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 12:30 PM

FAUX viewer fantasy...
busheep.jpg, image/jpeg, 500x480

Bend over little two legged sheepies.

add your comments


actually, that's kinda funny
by USS Withered Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 12:38 PM

But don't dish it out if you can't take it.

add your comments


Somebody is falsely posting under my name, which while apparently allowable, is not honest
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 3:18 PM
BraveNewWorldOrderFighter@yahoo.com

No further comment at this time.

add your comments


Here is the post falsely signed with my name.
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 3:20 PM
BraveNewWorldOrderFighter@yahoo.com

open arms
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter • Monday November 10, 2003 at 02:20 PM



So why is it the homosexuals complain when they're not received with open arms?

Seems hypocritical to me.


add your comments

add your comments


J'accuse
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter Monday, Nov. 10, 2003 at 3:52 PM

The two above posts were not mine.

They were holograms.

Thank you....

add your comments


© 2001-2009 Pittsburgh Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not endorsed by the Pittsburgh Independent Media Center.
Disclaimer | Privacy